Skip to main content
    Back to Topics

    Susan E. Lukas 9/11 Servicemember Fairness Act (H.R. 5339)

    Last updated: 2026-10-11
    General education only. This page describes how VA generally evaluates these claims under federal regulations. It is not legal advice and is not a recommendation about any individual claim. Every veteran's facts and evidence are different — for guidance on a specific situation, speak with a VA-accredited representative.

    What the bill would do

    According to the sponsor's announcement, the bill would treat servicemembers who returned to the Pentagon during the cleanup window as toxic-exposed for purposes. Supporters describe exposure to cement dust, glass fibers, asbestos, lead, mold, and smoke from the Flight 77 impact and fire.

    Reporting by Military Times notes this group generally does not qualify under the World Trade Center Health Program or the existing locations. Advocates estimate roughly 10,000 servicemembers could be affected.

    • Covered window (as proposed): September 11, 2001 through November 19, 2001
    • Location: duty at the Pentagon
    • Effect (as proposed): access to VA health care and a presumption of for exposure-related conditions

    Conditions listed in the bill text

    The introduced text would add a new section, 38 U.S.C. § 1120A, creating a presumption for a "covered " — anyone who performed active service while assigned to a duty station at the Pentagon Reservation from September 11 through November 19, 2001. A listed disease becoming manifest in a covered veteran would be considered incurred in service even with no record of it during service, subject to the usual rebuttal rules in 38 U.S.C. § 1113.

    • Asthma
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
    • Emphysema
    • Tracheomalacia
    • Cancer of any type
    • Cardiovascular disease of any type
    • Skin disease of any type
    • Respiratory disease of any type
    • Any other illness VA adds by regulation based on a positive association with a hazard on VA's toxic-exposure list

    Who the bill is named for

    Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Susan E. Lukas was in the Pentagon on 9/11 and returned to work the next day. She has described chronic respiratory problems she connects to the exposure.

    Where it stands

    As of this page's last update, the bill has been introduced and discussed at a February 2026 subcommittee hearing alongside H.R. 4469 (radiation dose documentation) and H.R. 1685 (ALS survivor compensation). Check Congress.gov for current status; bills often change or stall before becoming law.

    Without the bill, a Pentagon-exposure is evaluated on a direct basis: a current diagnosis, evidence of the in-service exposure, and a medical opinion linking them.

    What the decision letter says

    What appears in your VA paperwork and what it means procedurally
    If your record shows thisWhat it means
    Denied because Pentagon duty is not a PACT Act locationCorrect under current law; the bill is not enacted. The question is whether VA addressed direct service connection.
    Exposure not concededDuty location and dates come from personnel records, orders, and evaluations.
    No medical opinion obtainedVA's duty to assist may be at issue when the record shows a diagnosis and plausible exposure.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References & sources

    1. Rep. Subramanyam — Introduces bipartisan legislation to extend PACT Act (Sept. 11, 2025) — U.S. House
    2. Military Times — Bills seek to improve VA benefits for 9/11 survivors, other exposures (Feb. 4, 2026) — Military Times
    3. Congress.gov — H.R. 5339 — Congress.gov

    Useful Tools & Topics

    Have questions about your specific case?

    Tell us about your claim, rating increase, or VA decision for a free case evaluation — a decision letter is helpful but not required. If your matter fits our current scope, we'll invite you to schedule a consultation.

    Disclaimer: This page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Oakridge Claims is a private business and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. No guarantees of outcomes are made. Each claim is decided on its individual facts.

    ★

    Need Help With a VA Claim or Decision?

    Tell us about your claim, rating increase, or VA decision for a free case evaluation — a decision letter is helpful but not required. If your matter fits our practice, we'll invite you to schedule a consultation.