Type a few words from your decision letter — or scroll the list. Each entry explains what VA decided and what the record needs next.
“Not incurred in or caused by service”
What it means: VA accepted a current diagnosis and something in service, but found no link between them. This is a nexus finding under the Caluza elements.
What moves it: The target is the reasoning in the examination report VA relied on. A medical opinion helps only if it engages that reasoning with a rationale — a second opinion saying the same thing does not add weight.
Do I need another nexus letter? →“No current diagnosis of a disability”
What it means: VA found no diagnosed disability in the record. Pain alone can qualify after Saunders v. Wilkie, 886 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2018), when it causes functional impairment.
What moves it: This is a diagnosis and functional-loss evidence question, not a causation question. Treatment records and a current examination are what move it.
Denied for no current diagnosis →“No evidence of an event, injury, or disease in service”
What it means: The service record VA has does not document the event. Missing service treatment records are common and do not end the claim.
What moves it: This is a records problem: personnel files, unit records, deck logs, line-of-duty reports, buddy statements, and — for combat — 38 U.S.C. § 1154(b).
Denied for no in-service event →“Criteria for a higher evaluation are not met”
What it means: Service connection was granted. The disagreement is about measurements against 38 CFR Part 4, including flare-ups under DeLuca and joint testing under Correia.
What moves it: Compare the examination findings to the diagnostic code criteria. An inadequate examination is itself a ground for review.
Was your C&P exam adequate? →“The effective date is [a date later than you filed]”
What it means: Effective dates run under 38 CFR § 3.400 and are frequently the largest dollar issue in a decision — months or years of retroactive pay.
What moves it: Inside one year of the decision, the date is challenged in a review lane. After finality, the argument has to meet the clear-and-unmistakable-error standard.
Earlier effective date claims →“Entitlement to individual unemployability is denied”
What it means: VA found the service-connected conditions do not prevent substantially gainful employment under 38 CFR § 4.16. Marginal and protected work does not count against you.
What moves it: Work history, accommodations, absences, and failed work attempts are the record VA weighs — not just the percentages.
TDIU application guide →“We propose to reduce your evaluation”
What it means: A proposal is not a decision. Payments continue through the notice period, and the burden to justify the action sits with VA.
What moves it: Two clocks start: 60 days to submit evidence and 30 days to request a predetermination hearing under 38 CFR § 3.105(e) and (i).
Proposed rating reduction →“Not shown to be caused or aggravated by the service-connected disability”
What it means: A secondary claim under 38 CFR § 3.310 was denied. Aggravation is a separate theory from causation and is often never addressed.
What moves it: Check whether the examiner answered both questions. An opinion that only addresses causation leaves aggravation undecided.
Secondary service connection →