Blue Water Navy (Vietnam) Exposure
Background — why this law was needed
After the 's 2008 Haas v. Peake decision, the VA limited the presumption to veterans with 'boots on the ground' or service on the inland waterways of Vietnam (). Veterans who served on aircraft carriers, destroyers, cruisers, and other vessels offshore — the — were excluded for more than a decade.
In 2019, the 's en banc decision in Procopio v. Wilkie reversed the VA's interpretation. Congress codified that result in the Vietnam Veterans Act of 2019, restoring presumptive service-connection to ships operating within 12 nautical miles of Vietnam's coastline during the qualifying period.
Who qualifies
- Service on a covered ship between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975.
- Ship's location within 12 nautical miles of the Republic of Vietnam (including specified islands) on at least one day of the 's tour.
- A current diagnosis on the 38 CFR § 3.309(e) presumptive list (or a derivative/secondary condition).
Proving the 12-nautical-mile location
VA maintains a list of ships with confirmed dates and locations of qualifying service. The list is searchable on ('Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents'). For unlisted ships, veterans can supply deck logs, ship histories, after-action reports, and personnel records to establish the qualifying location.
If your ship is on the published list with the relevant dates, presumption attaches with very little additional development. If your ship is not on the list, plan to file deck-log evidence with the .
Reopening prior 'blue water' denials
A pre-2019 denial of an presumptive that was based on service is generally a strong candidate for a under 38 CFR § 3.156. The Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act is treated as new and relevant evidence. Effective dates can sometimes trace back to the , depending on filing windows under the Act and 38 CFR § 3.400.
Where these claims break down
- ×Assuming all offshore Vietnam service qualifies — the ship must have been within 12 nautical miles on at least one date of the tour.
- ×Filing without checking the VA-published ships list first.
- ×Failing to request deck logs from the National Archives when the ship is unlisted.
- ×Letting a pre-2019 denial sit instead of filing a Supplemental Claim under the new law.
Frequently Asked Questions
Useful Tools & Topics
Have questions about your specific case?
Every veteran's facts are different. A free initial consultation with a VA-Accredited Claims Agent can tell you whether your matter is a fit for representation — and what the right next step looks like either way.
Disclaimer: This page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Oakridge Claims is a private business and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. No guarantees of outcomes are made. Each claim is decided on its individual facts.
Related guides
Hexavalent Chromium (Qarmat Ali)
Sodium dichromate exposure at the Qarmat Ali water treatment plant in Iraq, 2003.
Korean DMZ Agent Orange Claims
Korea-era veterans who served in or near the DMZ may qualify for the same presumption Vietnam veterans receive.
Agent Orange & Herbicides
Vietnam, Korean DMZ, Thailand, and other recognized herbicide exposure presumptive conditions.
K2 / Karshi-Khanabad (Uzbekistan)
Service at K2 air base from 2001–2005 — recognized PACT Act presumptive location and known contaminants.

